Overhead law-library table under a green banker's lamp: Discovery Files, Deposition Prep, and Plaintiff's Exhibits folders, redacted depositions, and photographs connected by amber thread lines converging onto a central Product Liability — Failure to Warn case-theory memo, with a leather padfolio engraved 'Dom' holding a yellow legal pad headed 'Supported elements' with handwritten partner notes in the foreground

Turn discovery into leverage.

Litigation Domination reads your entire discovery production — every deposition, exhibit, and email — finds the facts that matter, and connects them to the evidence that proves each element of your case.

Meet Dom.

Not a dashboard. A senior partner who has already read every page of the production — tells you what matters, and does the work: drafts interrogatories, RFPs, demand letters and depo outlines, and builds the spreadsheets.

Litigation Domination
Strongest theory: Failure to Warn277 findings6 gaps flagged
D
Dom

Good morning. Three things on the Mercer production — 312,847 pages, fully reviewed overnight.

First, I evaluated two theories: Product Liability — Failure to Warn and Negligent Design. The strongest is Failure to Warn.

Second, I found 277 evidence findings across the theory-element pairs. The defendant's own March 2024 safety memo flags the exact hazard their later expert report calls “immaterial.” That contradiction supports your Inadequate Warning element.

Third, there are 6 evidence gaps — the production is thin on proximate causation. I've drafted the discovery requests that would close them.

You

Show me the memo and the deposition testimony side by side.

D
Dom

Pulled. Exhibit A-2 (3/14/24 memo) next to Depo p.142 — the inspector's timeline and the testimony don't reconcile. I flagged 11 more contradictions like it and grouped them by deposition topic.

You

Get me a list of key persons for depo prep.

D
Dom

Here are the top five people identified in the files for deposition, ranked by what they can establish:

1. Karen Doyle — VP of Product Safety, Atlas. Named recipient of the consultant's hazard memo.

2. Dr. Alan Pruitt — outside consultant who authored the March 2024 hazard report.

3. Thomas Reyes — Regulatory Affairs Director; owned the product warning and label.

4. Lisa Hargrove — QA Manager; signed off on pre-release testing.

5. Mark Feldman — Marketing lead; the “immaterial” characterization traces to his team.

Attached is a deposition outline for Karen Doyle — the questions walk her into confirming she received and read Dr. Pruitt's March 2024 hazard report before the warning label was finalized. I also built a witness matrix mapping each deponent to the elements they support.

Depo outline — Karen Doyle.docxWitness matrix.xlsx
Ask Dom about this production…

From a million pages to your actionable intelligence.

Manual review is slow, expensive, and misses things. Litigation Domination turns the document dump into an arsenal of leverage — the facts that move the other side long before trial.

1

Ingest the whole production

Drop in the entire discovery set — depositions, exhibits, email productions, medical records, expert reports. Hundreds of thousands of pages, processed in hours instead of months.

2

Find the evidence

Every document is read and cross-referenced. Facts are extracted, evidence is established, and elements are supported — clearing away all the hay so the needle is left in plain sight.

3

Build your leverage

Know your next best move to build leverage — and anticipate opposing counsel's likely next action before they make it.

What it surfaces in your discovery.

The intelligence a senior associate would find given unlimited time — across every page, every time.

Direct evidence

Surfaces the documents and testimony that prove a fact outright — the smoking-gun memo, the admission, the signed record — with the citation attached.

Pattern evidence

Connects recurring facts across the production into patterns — repeated complaints, prior incidents, course of conduct — that no single document shows on its own.

Contradictions & Gaps

Catches where testimony conflicts with the documents, and flags the holes and impossible sequences in the defense's account.

Inferential & Corroborating Evidence

Finds the circumstantial facts and supporting exhibits across the record that back up each inference and strengthen the chain of proof.

Evidence-to-Element Support

Maps every fact to the element of your legal theory it supports, so you can see which elements are airtight and which need shoring up.

Vulnerabilities & Affirmative Defenses

Surfaces where your case is exposed — and the affirmative defenses the other side will raise — before they do, so you can de-risk on your terms.

The manual way is costing you future cases.

Scale your firm by 100+ senior associates with the push of a button. A million-page production is roughly 20,000 hours of human review — Dom does it in days, freeing your attorneys to take on more cases.

Manual review

  • Time to first findings

    Weeks of associate hours
  • Cost

    Tens of thousands in billable review
  • Coverage

    Sampling — you read what you can
  • Contradictions caught

    Only what someone happens to notice
  • Tied to your legal theory

    Reassembled by hand, late

Litigation Domination

  • Time to first findings

    Overnight, across the full production
  • Cost

    A fraction of one associate's time
  • Coverage

    Every page, every document, every time
  • Contradictions caught

    Cross-referenced automatically
  • Tied to your legal theory

    Mapped to each element from day one
Coming soon

Underwrite your case for funding.

The same evidence and risk analysis Dom runs to build your theory also qualifies the case for bridge financing — so a strong matter never stalls for cash while it plays out.

Evidence-backed valuation

The merits analysis Dom already runs becomes the basis for the case's funding profile.

No second diligence cycle

Underwriting reads the same record you uploaded — no separate data room, no re-review.

Capital that keeps pace

Qualify strong matters for bridge financing so a winning case never stalls on cash flow.

Built for attorneys. By people who understand litigation.

Litigation Domination was built by people who have lived in courtrooms, managed caseloads, and fought against carriers who underpay claims. We built the partner we wished we had — one that reads everything, forgets nothing, and is ready the moment you need it.

Your data stays yours. Your work product stays yours. Your partner works for you and nobody else.

Data encrypted at rest and in transit

No data shared between firms — ever

SOC 2 Type II compliance

Your partner works for you and nobody else

Upload your discovery. Find your leverage.

Free trial. No credit card. No configuration. See what a single production reveals.

Start your free trial

No credit card required. No sales call. Just upload and see.