
Litigation Domination reads your entire discovery production — every deposition, exhibit, and email — finds the facts that matter, and connects them to the evidence that proves each element of your case.
Not a dashboard. A senior partner who has already read every page of the production — tells you what matters, and does the work: drafts interrogatories, RFPs, demand letters and depo outlines, and builds the spreadsheets.
Good morning. Three things on the Mercer production — 312,847 pages, fully reviewed overnight.
First, I evaluated two theories: Product Liability — Failure to Warn and Negligent Design. The strongest is Failure to Warn.
Second, I found 277 evidence findings across the theory-element pairs. The defendant's own March 2024 safety memo flags the exact hazard their later expert report calls “immaterial.” That contradiction supports your Inadequate Warning element.
Third, there are 6 evidence gaps — the production is thin on proximate causation. I've drafted the discovery requests that would close them.
Show me the memo and the deposition testimony side by side.
Pulled. Exhibit A-2 (3/14/24 memo) next to Depo p.142 — the inspector's timeline and the testimony don't reconcile. I flagged 11 more contradictions like it and grouped them by deposition topic.
Get me a list of key persons for depo prep.
Here are the top five people identified in the files for deposition, ranked by what they can establish:
1. Karen Doyle — VP of Product Safety, Atlas. Named recipient of the consultant's hazard memo.
2. Dr. Alan Pruitt — outside consultant who authored the March 2024 hazard report.
3. Thomas Reyes — Regulatory Affairs Director; owned the product warning and label.
4. Lisa Hargrove — QA Manager; signed off on pre-release testing.
5. Mark Feldman — Marketing lead; the “immaterial” characterization traces to his team.
Attached is a deposition outline for Karen Doyle — the questions walk her into confirming she received and read Dr. Pruitt's March 2024 hazard report before the warning label was finalized. I also built a witness matrix mapping each deponent to the elements they support.
Manual review is slow, expensive, and misses things. Litigation Domination turns the document dump into an arsenal of leverage — the facts that move the other side long before trial.
Drop in the entire discovery set — depositions, exhibits, email productions, medical records, expert reports. Hundreds of thousands of pages, processed in hours instead of months.
Every document is read and cross-referenced. Facts are extracted, evidence is established, and elements are supported — clearing away all the hay so the needle is left in plain sight.
Know your next best move to build leverage — and anticipate opposing counsel's likely next action before they make it.
The intelligence a senior associate would find given unlimited time — across every page, every time.
Surfaces the documents and testimony that prove a fact outright — the smoking-gun memo, the admission, the signed record — with the citation attached.
Connects recurring facts across the production into patterns — repeated complaints, prior incidents, course of conduct — that no single document shows on its own.
Catches where testimony conflicts with the documents, and flags the holes and impossible sequences in the defense's account.
Finds the circumstantial facts and supporting exhibits across the record that back up each inference and strengthen the chain of proof.
Maps every fact to the element of your legal theory it supports, so you can see which elements are airtight and which need shoring up.
Surfaces where your case is exposed — and the affirmative defenses the other side will raise — before they do, so you can de-risk on your terms.
Scale your firm by 100+ senior associates with the push of a button. A million-page production is roughly 20,000 hours of human review — Dom does it in days, freeing your attorneys to take on more cases.
Time to first findings
Cost
Coverage
Contradictions caught
Tied to your legal theory
Time to first findings
Cost
Coverage
Contradictions caught
Tied to your legal theory
The same evidence and risk analysis Dom runs to build your theory also qualifies the case for bridge financing — so a strong matter never stalls for cash while it plays out.
The merits analysis Dom already runs becomes the basis for the case's funding profile.
Underwriting reads the same record you uploaded — no separate data room, no re-review.
Qualify strong matters for bridge financing so a winning case never stalls on cash flow.
Litigation Domination was built by people who have lived in courtrooms, managed caseloads, and fought against carriers who underpay claims. We built the partner we wished we had — one that reads everything, forgets nothing, and is ready the moment you need it.
Your data stays yours. Your work product stays yours. Your partner works for you and nobody else.
Data encrypted at rest and in transit
No data shared between firms — ever
SOC 2 Type II compliance
Your partner works for you and nobody else
Free trial. No credit card. No configuration. See what a single production reveals.
No credit card required. No sales call. Just upload and see.